This was the title of one of my posts in April 2009, without the parenthetical addition shown today. That blog emphasized the job role (blending) and leadership to build an effective structure and team. I followed up with "Hire the Best", identifying over-qualified candidates as a hiring benefit.
After four years, the world of hiring is finally showing improvements. I have just signed onto a company providing production, process and business expertise. Their selection process involved a panel interview; five candidates and seven company members. I entered the foray at the last minute, due to overcoming the initial over-qualified perception.
There are several articles touting the benefits of hiring older people, including Entrepreneur, Huffington Post, Inc. A Forbes article last fall compares young verse old(er) entrepreneur's advantages.
After the panel interview, the company team immediately meets to select those worthy of returning for individual interviews and a screening test.
Two days later, I received a call to have lunch with the company president. During lunch, we discussed my motives, intentions and deliverables. He offered me the position on the spot, without further steps in the process.
Why this works:
- The playing field was level between candidates
- The playing field was level on the company side
- Time was efficient - no long hours with individuals or return trips (see "Are You Smart Enough Not to be Stupid, my last blog post)
- The company gave me the opportunity one-on-one with the president to clarify my goals and motives, rather than be dismissed
Most importantly, they recognized the value, abilities and contributions beyond their current needs.
The question today - Where do you stand in your best hiring practices? You might be missing out on the best candidate, using preconceived, or worse, antiquated beliefs.